Home
foot pain finder
my blog
conditions achilles tendonitis
ankle pain
apophysitis
arthritis
athletes foot
blisters
blue toe syndrome
bone spur
bottom of foot pain
brachymetatarsia
bunion
burns
bursitis
capsulitis
cavus foot
cellulitis
Charcot foot
circulation
cold feet
compartment synd.
CRPS
cuboid syndrome
decubitus ulcer
diabetic foot
eczema
edema
ESWT
flat feet
foot anatomy
foot odor
fracture
Freiberg's disease
ganglion cyst
gangrene
gout
hallux limitus
hammertoes
heel fissure
heel neuroma
heel pain
high ankle sprain
illiotibial band
ingrown nail
intoeing
IPK
juvenile bunion
lateral column pain
Lisfranc joint
melanoma
metatarsalgia
midtarsal fault
Mortons neuroma
nail fungus
neuropathy
night cramps
obesity
orthotics
os peroneum
osteomyelitis
osteoporosis
os trigonum
os tibiale naviculare
overlapping toes
pain medication
piezogenic papules
plantar fibromatosis
poison ivy
porokeratosis
proper shoe fitting
psoriasis
puncture wounds
restless legs
runners knee
running shoes
Salter-Harris
scars
sesamoiditis
shin splints
side of foot pain
sinus tarsi syndrome
surgical consideration
syndactaly
talar dome fx
tarsal coalition
tarsal tunnel
tendonitis
top of foot pain
turf toe
venous stasis ulcer
walking
warts
additional information Dr. Mitnick
privacy statement
online store
find a podiatrist
order form
visitors comments
medical studies
[?] Subscribe To This Site

XML RSS
Add to Google
Add to My Yahoo!
Add to My MSN
Subscribe with Bloglines

lis franc fracture

by Elaine
(Englnd)

I suffered a lisfranc fracture on 26 December last year. I had 2 xrays but the fracture didnt show up until they did a scan on the 28 January, nearly 4 weeks after the injury. They decided that i did not need a plate fitted and put me in cast for 6 weeks and then a boot. It has now been decided (8 months after the injury) that they now need to put a plate in my foot as i have a problem with my big toe and my 2nd metatarsol. Why did they not do this at the beginning and is this problem related to the delay in them detecting my injury early on





ANSWER

Hi Elaine,

Medicine is not an exact science. Medical decisions are made at the time with the best information available to the doctor. I am not going to second guess your doctor; that would not be fair to he or she nor to me.
When a person sustains a fracture the actual fracture line has to be assessed. In general we look at the degree of fracture (small crack vs. large fracture line). We also look at the degree of separation of the fracture line. If it is too wide then we know that the probability of the fracture healing is reduced.
We also look at the overall health of the individual. If the patient is overweight or is a smoker than we know that the odds of healing are diminished.
The fact that it took a bone scan to find the fracture and it was not even visible on two x-rays leads me to believe that it was a very small fracture and because of that your doctor elected to try the more conservative route.
Unfortunately, any treatment option for any condition in medicine has the potential to fail. Unfortunately for you the treatment regimen selected by your doctor did not work out.
In my opinion, the sign of a good doctor is one who can identify any problems that may arise with treatment and then rectify them.
You can look at this situation another way. Suppose your doctor had put screws and a plate in your foot initially, and you had problems with it, which happens quite often. You would then be faced with having all that hardware removed with the possibility of still having problems with the fracture site.
As I said earlier, medicine is not an exact science.

Marc Mitnick DPM
DISCLAIMER

Click here to post comments.

Join in and write your own page! It's easy to do. How?
Simply click here to return to Ask the doctor
.






Know your problem?
Solve it at our store

foot care products


Find a USA podiatrist

Locate a podiatrist